LawInc » News » SiriusXM’s Cancellation Nightmare: NY AG Strikes a Chord for Consumer Rights
SiriusXM’s Cancellation Nightmare: NY AG Strikes a Chord for Consumer Rights
SHARE
The New York Attorney General has successfully challenged SiriusXM's predatory cancellation practices, marking a significant victory for consumer rights. This landmark ruling will force SiriusXM to simplify its subscription cancellation process, empowering nearly 2 million New York subscribers to easily unsubscribe without facing aggressive retention tactics.
New York Attorney General Letitia James has secured a court decision against SiriusXM, finding the company’s subscription cancellation process illegal.
SiriusXM’s cancellation process was systematically designed to prevent subscribers from easily ending their service:
Forced customers to call or chat with live agents
Trained agents to resist cancellation attempts
Presented up to five retention offers during cancellation
Deliberately extended conversation times
Documented Customer Experiences
Concrete examples highlighted the company’s aggressive retention strategies:
One customer was kept in a chat for 40 minutes despite repeated cancellation requests
Average cancellation times:
Phone: 11.5 minutes
Online: 30 minutes
Some customers experienced even longer interaction times
Subscriber Impact
Total subscribers: 35 million
New York subscribers: Nearly 2 million
Widespread complaints across multiple consumer agencies
Legal Consequences and Mandated Changes
SiriusXM must now:
Simplify cancellation procedures
Provide a straightforward cancellation method
No longer require live agent interactions
Pay unspecified damages
Company Response
SiriusXM maintains a defensive stance:
Claims court dismissed “almost all” allegations
Argues their policies were not misleading
Intends to appeal the technical violations
Will comply with upcoming FTC “click-to-cancel” rule effective January 14, 2025
Broader Implications
The ruling represents a significant consumer protection victory, potentially setting a precedent for other subscription-based services with complex cancellation processes.
This decision underscores the growing legal scrutiny of predatory subscription retention practices and reinforces consumer rights in the digital marketplace.